Les hommes ont oublié cette vérité. Mais tu ne dois pas l'oublier, dit le renard. Tu deviens responsable pour toujours de ce que tu as apprivoisé.
Le Petit Prince, chap. 21

Thursday 1 August 2013

Bells and electronic sonic device reducing predation by cats in UK

Nelson, S. H., Evans, A. D., & Bradbury, R. B. (2005). The efficacy of collar-mounted devices in reducing the rate of predation of wildlife by domestic cats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 94(3), 273-285.

Volunteer cat owners from across the UK were recruited to take part in two trials designed to test the efficacy of collar-mounted warning devices in reducing cat predation rates of native wildlife. Cats equipped with a bell returned 34% fewer mammals and 41% fewer birds than those with a plain collar. Those equipped with an electronic sonic device returned 38% fewer mammals and 51% fewer birds compared with cats wearing a plain collar. There was no significant difference in prey return rates by cats wearing collars equipped with one bell, two bells or the sonic device. Warning devices mounted on quick-release collars are recommended as an effective way of reducing wildlife kill rates by domestic cats. Future research and development aimed at further improving the efficacy of sonic devices is recommended.


______________________

You can see early reports of CatAlert device here

Clark, N. A. & N.H.K. Burton (1998). A pilot field trial into the effectiveness of the CatAlert™ collar at reducing predation by domestic cats. British Trust for Ornithology.

Clark, N. A. (1999). Progress report on the effectiveness of the Mark II CatAlert™ collar at reducing predation by domestic cats. British Trust for Ornithology.
______________________

Read a short review about belling effectiveness

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...