Suppression of Fertility in Adult Cats

Goericke‐Pesch, S., Wehrend, A., & Georgiev, P. (2014). Suppression of Fertility in Adult Cats. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 49(s2), 33-40.

Cats are animals with highly efficient reproduction, clearly pointing to a need for suppression of fertility. Although surgical contraception is highly effective, it is not always the method of choice. This is predominantly because it is cost-intensive, time-consuming and irreversible, with the latter being of major importance for cat breeders. This article reviews the use of progestins, scleroting agents, immunocontraception, melatonin, GnRH antagonists and finally, GnRH agonists, in adult male and female cats in detail, according to the present state of the art. By now, various scientific and clinical options are available for the suppression of fertility in adult cats and the decision as to which should be chosen – independent of the legal registration of any state – depends on different facts: (i) feral or privately owned animal? (ii) temporary or permanent suppression of fertility wanted/needed? (iii) sex of the animal? New effective and available methods for hormonal contraception include melatonin implants for short-term post ponement of oestrus in adult queens and slow-release GnRH-agonist implants containing deslorelin (Suprelorin^®) for short- and long-term contraception in male and female companion and breeding cats.

Two classics in ecology: Mesopredator release

Soulé, M. E., Bolger, D. T., Alberts, A. C., Wrights, J., Sorice, M., & Hill, S. (1988). Reconstructed dynamics of rapid extinctions of chaparral‐requiring birds in urban habitat islands. Conservation Biology, 2(1), 75-92.

The distribution of native, chaparral-requiring bird species was determined for 37 isolated fragments of canyon habitat ranging in size from 0.4 to 104 hectares in coastal, urban San Diego County, California. The area of chaparral habitat and canyon age (time since isolation of the habitat fragment) explains most of the variation in the number of chaparral-requiring bird species. In addition, the distribution of native predators may influence species number. There is statistical evidence that coyotes control the populations of smaller predators such as foxes and domestic cats. The absence of coyotes may lead to higher levels of predation by a process of mesopredator release. The distance of canyons from other patches of chaparral habitat does not add significantly to the explained variance in chaparral-requiring species number–probably because of the virtual inability of most chaparral-requiring species to disperse through developed areas and nonscrub habitats. These results and other lines of evidence suggest that chaparral-requiring birds in isolated canyons have very high rates of extinction, in part because of their low vagility. The best predictors of vulnerability of the individual species are their abundances (densities) in undisturbed habitat and their body sizes; together these two variables account for 95 percent of the variation in canyon occupancy. A hypothesis is proposed to account for the similarity between the steep slopes of species-area curves for chaparral-requiring birds and the slopes for some forest birds on small islands or in habitat fragments. The provision of corridors appears to be the most effective design and planning feature for preventing the elimination of chaparral-requiring species in a fragmented landscape.

En el condado urbano de San Diego, California 37 fragmentos de hábitat de cañón que varían de tamaño de 0.4 a 104 hectáreas fueron examinados para determinar la distribución de especies de aves nativas que requieren de chaparral. El tamaño del área de hábitat de chaparral y la edad del cañón (tiempo transcurrido desde que ocurrió el aislamiento del fragmento de hábitat explican la mayor parte de la variación en el número de especies de aves que requieren de este hábitat Así mismo, la distribución de depredadores nativos puede influenciar el número de especies. Existen evidencias estadísticas de que los coyotes controlan las poblaciones de depredadores menores tales como los zorros y los gatos domésticos. La ausencia de coyotes puede conducir a niveles de depredación mas altos mediante un proceso de liberación de mesodepredadores. El aislamiento de cañones con respecto a otros pedazos de hábitat de chaparral no incrementa significativamente la varianza en el número de especies que requieren chaparral – probablemente debido a la virtual inhabilitad de la mayoría de las especies que requieren chaparral para dispersarse en áreas desarrolladas y en hábitats no—arbustivos. Estos resultados y otras evidencias sugieren que las aves que requieren chaparral en los cañones aislados tienen muy altas tasas de extinción, en parte debido a su baja dispersabilidad. Los mejores pronosticadores de la vulnerabilidad de una especie en particular son su abundancia (densidad) en habitats no perturbados y el tamaño de sus cuerpos; juntas, estas dos variables explican el 95% de la variación de su residencia en el cañón. Una hipótesis es propuesta para explicar la similaridad entre las fuertes pendientes de la curves de especies-área para las aves que requieren chaparral y las pendientes para algunas aves de bosque en pequeñas islas o en hábitats fragmentados. La provisión de corredores parece ser el diseño y el rasgo de la planificación más efectivo para prevenir la eliminación de especies que requieren chaparral en un paisaje fragmentado.

Crooks, K. R., & Soulé, M. E. (1999). Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature, 400(6744), 563-566.

Mammalian carnivores are particularly vulnerable to extinction in fragmented landscapes, and their disappearance may lead to increased numbers of smaller carnivores that are principle predators of birds and other small vertebrates. Such 'mesopredator release' has been implicated in the decline and extinction of prey species. Because experimental manipulation of carnivores is logistically, financially and ethically problematic, however, few studies have evaluated how trophic cascades generated by the decline of dominant predators combine with other fragmentation effects to influence species diversity in terrestrial systems. Although the mesopredator release hypothesis has received only limited critical evaluation and remains controversial, it has become the basis for conservation programmes justifying the protection of carnivores. Here we describe a study that exploits spatial and temporal variation in the distribution and abundance of an apex predator, the coyote, in a landscape fragmented by development. It appears that the decline and disappearance of the coyote, in conjunction with the effects of habitat fragmentation, affect the distribution and abundance of smaller carnivores and the persistence of their avian prey.

Diet overlap between wild and domestic cat: advantages from being generalist

Biró, Z.,J. Lanszki, L. Szemethy, M. Heltai & E. Randi. 2005. Feeding habits of feral domestic cats (Felis catus), wild cats (Felis silvestris) and their hybrids: trophic niche overlap among cat groups in Hungary. Journal of Zoology, 266 (2): 187–196.

The feeding habits of feral domestic cats Felis catus (n=264), wild cats Felis silvestris (n=22) and their hybrids (n=30) were investigated in Hungary. Cat groups were identified taxonomically by morphological and molecular methods. Diet components were identified in stomach contents and faeces collected from the recta. In each cat group, abundant small mammals were dominant in the diet (relative frequency of occurrence: feral domestic cat, 61–82%, depending on regions; wild cat, 70%; hybrid, 59%). Birds were the second most important quarry (2–7%, 16% and 20%, respectively in the three cat groups), while the contribution of hares (1–2%, 5% and 3%, respectively) and other taxa was not significant. Every cat group preyed on small-sized animals (<50 g; 89–96%, 80% and 80%, respectively), terrestrial (91–98%, 84% and 86%, respectively) and wild (71–73%, 87% and 77%, respectively) prey. Standardized trophic niche breadth was typically very narrow (BA=0.07–0.16, 0.13 and 0.17, respectively). Feral domestic cats occasionally consumed household food (2–7%) and domestic animals (4–8%). This could mean that feral domestic cats have an advantage over wild cats that are food specialists. The trophic niche overlap between cat groups was high (77–88%). Food composition and feeding habits, (weight, zonation and environmental association of consumed prey) of feral domestic cats, however, was different compared to wild cats, which indicated the possibility of partial resource partitioning. The values for hybrids were between the two groups. As well as the stable presence of feral domestic cats (mean population density, D=1.34 individuals/1000 ha) based on field live-trapping, hybrids are also present (D=0.10), leading to continuous hybridization. This can threaten the population of wild cats, which are present at a low density (D=0.17).

Do wild dogs exclude foxes?

Mitchell, B. D., & Banks, P. B. (2005). Do wild dogs exclude foxes? Evidence for competition from dietary and spatial overlaps. Austral Ecology, 30(5), 581-591.

The management of wild canids (wild dogs/dingoes and foxes) presents a conservation dilemma for land managers across Australia. These canids are predators of wildlife and domestic stock but dingoes are considered native and anecdotal reports suggest that they may suppress foxes such that dingo/dog conservation may have a net benefit to wildlife. This study examines dietary and spatial interactions between wild dogs and foxes in the Greater Blue Mountains region of NSW to address the possibility of suppression through competitive exclusion by dogs on foxes. Predator diets were compared using faecal analysis as well as an analysis of 19 dietary studies from similar forest habitats in eastern Australia. Spatial relationships were examined using data from an extensive canid control programme. Diets of wild dogs and foxes showed a high degree of overlap in species taken, indicating potential for competition. But there was also evidence of resource partitioning with the size and arboreality of mammalian prey differing between the two predators. Wild dogs and foxes responded to different landscape-scale variation in the physical environment, but there was no clear evidence of large-scale differences in their distribution. At the fine scale there was a negative association between these predators that indicated possible temporal avoidance or localized habitat shifts. Therefore, there is evidence for dietary competition and fine-scale exclusion, but no support for landscape-scale exclusion of foxes by wild dogs in the Blue Mountains.

Cats predation and winter shortages for raptor prey

George, W.G.. 1974. Domestic cats as predators and factors in winter shortages of raptor prey. The Wilson Bulletin 86(4):384-396.

The  reader  who  has  digested  my  findings  can  imagine  that  a hawk  visiting my  study  site  in  the  winters  of  1968-1971  was  more  apt  to  see a  cat  than  a rodent

A  continuous  study  of  predation  by  three  rural  cats  was  conducted  in  Union  County, southern  Illinois,  from  1  January  1968  through  31  December  1971.  The  results  established  a  basis  for  examining  the  possibility  that  cat  predation  may  result  in  depleted winter  populations  of  microtine  rodents  and  other  prey  of  Red-tailed  Hawks,  Marsh Hawks,  and  American  Kestrels. 

Although  one of  the  three  cats never  ate  prey  and  each cat  was  assured  an  ample  supply  of  daily  food  at  home,  all  captured  prey.  Their  combined  predation  removed  an annual  average  of  483.5  vertebrates  and  286.4  mammalian  fetuses  from  a  combined  home range  of  22  acres  of  field  habitat  and  three  acres  of  woods.  By  volume,  the  principal prey  were  non-adult  cottontails,  by  frequency  of  captures,  prairie  voles.  Rodents  of seven  species  constituted  81.9  percent  of  the  total  combined  diurnal-crepuscular- nocturnal  catch,  and  over  95  percent  of  the  crepuscular-nocturnal  catch. 

The  cats  obtained  92.6  percent  of  their  average  annual  diurnal  captures  between  1 March  and  30  November.  Their  hunting  sucess in  winter  was  very  poor,  probably  as a  result  of  prey  shortages that  their  own  prior  predation  may  have  helped  create.  It  is suggested  that  when  captures  of  preferred  prey  by  skillful,  experienced  cats  on  their natal  hunting  grounds  sharply  decline,  the  home  range  of  the  cats  contains  few  such prey  for rodent-seeking  hawks.