Hawkins, C.C., W.E. Grant & M.T. Longnecker. 1999. Effect of subsidized house cats on California birds and rodents. Transactions of the Western Section of The Wildlife Society, 35: 29-33
Cat
advocates are establishing feeding stations in public parks, often claiming
that well-fed cats pose little threat to wildlife. This claim was tested east
of San Francisco , California , in a cat area and a no-cat area. In
1995, more harvest mice were trapped in the no-cat area. In 1996, more harvest
mice (Reithrodontomys megalotis) and deer mice (Peromyscus sp.) were trapped in
the no-cat area, and more house mice were trapped in the cat area. The numbers
of trapped California
meadow voles (Microtus californicus) were not different between the areas in
either year. More native rodents were trapped in the no-cat area. Birds present
during the breeding season were seen more often in the no-cat area. California
quail (Callipepla californicus) and California
thrashers (Toxostoma redivivum) were present in the no-cat area and absent in
the cat area. Cats at artificially high densities, sustained by supplementary
feeding, reduced the abundance or native rodent and bird populations, changed
the rodent species composition, and may have facilitated the expansion of the
house mouse into new areas. Thus we recommend that the feeding of cats in parks
should be strictly prohibited.
No comments:
Post a Comment